Goodbye 3.5mm jack: Apple set to eliminate legacy connector and that’s a good thing

3.5mm audio connector
We’ve lived with the 3.5mm audio connector for decades. Will Apple get rid of the legacy connector? Image courtesy of V-Moda

Tomorrow Apple is set to unveil the iPhone 7. Rumors are that the new iPhone will be the first mobile device to jettison the 3.5mm jack. That’s met with mixed reviews, including Apple’s co-founder Steve Wozniak who has advocated that Apple shouldn’t get rid of the legacy connector.

I’ve thought long and hard about the news and if Apple does indeed move ahead as rumored, then I’m OK with it… sort of.

In case you’re keeping track, this wouldn’t be the first time Apple made such a move.  Apple was the first company to stop offering a floppy disk drive in its computers and then followed up that act by dumping the CD/DVD player. In each case, Apple received some backlash but ended up being years ahead of the curve.  That’s likely the case yet again.

Apple is likely moving in this direction for a few reasons. First, the 3.5mm jack takes up valuable space. Eliminating it and having people connect headphones via the lightning connector with a 3.5mm adapter or Bluetooth makes sense. You can add more circuitry or other features or you can make the phone even thinner.  Ever notice how the 3.5mm jack determines the iPhone’s thickness?

Secondly, as noted in the MacRumors article above, it’s a lot easier to make the iPhone water resistant if that wide open jack is eliminated. How many people drop their phones into pools (or worse).

Third, it’s analog. By transitioning, you can provide the opportunity for the headphone maker to take on DAC functionality at the headphone.

The plus side

The latter point is why I’m OK with getting rid of the 3.5mm jack. Yes, maybe it’s a perceived pain to use an adapter but the reality is unless you’re a reviewer like me you aren’t swapping out different pairs of headphones frequently.  I also like the idea that we can have a connection capable of delivering hi-res music files to the headphones for decoding natively.

There’s also the opportunity (if manufacturers chose to do it) is create a new generation of headphones that might be considered more like active speakers. Instead of relying solely on the source device to provide amplification, a battery in the headphones could provide that option in much the same way that wireless headphones do already.

The down side

There’s also a potentially major downside here too that’s important to note. It’s certain that Apple will be pushing wireless headphones as a result of this transition. In this case, wireless means Bluetooth and that’ s not necessarily a good thing. Apple hasn’t traditionally supported the aptX codec, which gives near CD-quality sound when streaming music over Bluetooth.  If Apple doesn’t support aptX (or launch some other codec with similar or better performance) then we’re once again taking a step back in audio quality and putting convenience first. (READ: our take on Apple’s war on Bluetooth with its new new W1 chip and wireless protocol)

V-Moda Crossfade Wireless
V-Moda Crossfade Wireless

To me, this means that the strides the audiophile community has made in advocating for better and better quality digital source files (in contrast to lossy mp3s for example) will take another step back. I don’t know about you, but there aren’t many Bluetooth headphones that I genuinely like to listen to in wireless mode. They just don’t sound great.

I should also note that I’m not a big fan of having wireless signals around my head all the time. I use Bluetooth headphones (like the 1More iBFree and B&W P5 wireless) but only on the rare occasion when I’m traveling and need hands-free. While there’s been conflicting research about cell phone radiation, my position is that if I have a set of wireless headphones, I want to have the option of using them in a wired mode.

Welcome to the future

Whatever announcement happens, one thing is for sure: whether or not Apple buries the 3.5mm jack, it’s been on life support for quite a while.  If Apple doesn’t pull the plug, someone else will soon enough. Welcome to the future of portable audio.



  1. The 3.5mm analog in/out port gets used for a lot more than just headphones. It also gets used for:
    • credit card readers like Square
    • hooking up to a car stereo via the little 3.5mm jack
    • hooking up to PA system or amplifier for use with iOS music apps like Garage Band, Moog Model 15, etc.

    In all of the above cases, it is also common for the user to also use the Lightning port to attach one of the following things:
    • a power source so the device does not die while being used for GPS navigation, music performance, or ringing up sales for customers
    • a MIDI keyboard for latency-free control of iOS music apps like Garage Band, Moog Model 15, etc.
    • an external display via Lightning to HDMI for latency-free image projection

    The removal of the analog output port on the iPhone is a horrible blow to all the customers who use their devices in those ways. Because now you need to first split the Lightning port into TWO Lightning ports. Then you need to adapt one of those Lightning ports to be a 3.5mm jack, and use the other one as you already would have done.

    This creates a chain of two additional adapters hanging off your device, creating a medusa of cables, making the iPhone far less of a “mobile” device. Whatever space was supposedly saved by removing the 3.5mm jack, about 10 times that much space will now be taken up by all the junk that is necessary to restore what was removed.

    This is a horrible thing. I can’t believe you people in these blogs and media are so supportive of this highly anti-consumer move by Apple. This is nothing like the removal of DVD drives or floppy drives, because when those were removed, barely anyone used them anymore. In this case, many people use the headphone port all the time; many people have significant investment in hardware that needs a 3.5mm port; and especially for musicians, the barrier to entry to use their phone for music is now much higher (which will be prohibitive for younger/poorer customers and the cash-strapped music education market).

    Please retract this article of yours and join those of us who are actively fighting and resisting this terrible change.

  2. Mind you that Apple as made a very good reputation among musicians. I’m a pianist and now I rely heavily on iPads as my main sound generators, in combination with good usb/ midi keyboard controllers. And yes, I play live on big shows and this as proven its reliability, even on very demanding and important tours.
    One of the big disavantages of iPads and iPhones are allready their few connections. Please don’t take away 3.5. Me and many others like me have allready made a very huge investment in software ( nearly every professional apps available for music production, with all the add ons, and thats a lot!).
    If you do that, many of us will have to abandon iPads for professional purposes. Apple will lose many good clients, like me, who allways need the latest iPad, not because its fancy, but because it makes sense in our work.
    Jack and mini-jack connections will never disapear. Jack cables are the industry standard and will continue to be for many years to come.
    Mind you also that android latency issue is being solved, so it will soon be possible to use android tablets in professional situations.
    Also, a dedicated charger port would be very important, or at least some kind of hub that makes it possible to charge while using lightning for data tranfer ( in my case, for audio and midi ).
    Probably iPads wasn’t designed for these purposes, but the fact is that it became a very good and explored platform for music production, so why don’t make it easy for us, instead of forcing us to throw our investments to the trash can?

Leave a Reply